Reflections on How Mathematics Education in Ohio Impacted the Nation
Keywords:
Mathematics Education Technology, Graphing Calculators, Curriculum ReformAbstract
This invited paper reflects on the evolution of technology in mathematics education, with a focus on how handheld graphing tools have transformed teaching and learning since their inception in the 1980s. Drawing on personal experiences and the visionary work of educators at The Ohio State University, the author examines the profound impact of visualization technologies and the enduring challenges of integrating technology into curricula. Key themes include the shifting priorities in K-12 mathematics, advances in technology like the TI-Nspire, and the potential of digital tools to enhance equity and engagement. The paper concludes by advocating for a renewed vision in mathematics education that emphasizes relevance, creativity, and access.
References
Burdman, P. (2018). The mathematics of opportunity: Rethinking the role of math in educational equity. Just Equations. https://tinyurl.com/burdman2018
Burrill, G. (1995, October). Algebra reform, research, and the classroom. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Burrill, G. (2015). Building concepts: Expressions, equations, and beginning algebra. In A. Rogerson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference of The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project: Mathematics Education in a Connected World.
Burrill, G. (2023). An international look at the status of statistical education. In G. Burrill, E. Reston, L. Souza (Eds.), Research on reasoning with data and statistical thinking: International perspectives (pp. 11–16). Springer.
Burrill, G. (submitted). Changing the face of high school mathematics.
College Board. (2023). AP Precalculus course and exam description. Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Mathematics. https://www.thecorestandards.org/Math/
Crosswhite, F. J. (1986). President's report: Better teaching, better mathematics: Are they enough? Arithmetic Teacher, 34(2), 54–59.
Dana Center Communications. (2022). Twenty states join the Launch Years Initiative. https://www.utdanacenter.org/twenty-states-join-launch-years-initiative
Hatfield, J. (2023). 72% of U.S. high school teachers say cellphone distraction is a major problem in the classroom. Pew Research Center. https://tinyurl.com/phone-distraction-PEW
Leinwand, S., & Milou, E. (2021). Invigorating high school math. Heinemann.
Levitt, S., & Severts, J. (2022). Every student needs 21st-century data-literacy skills. Forum: Rethinking math education. Education Next, 22(4).
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2022). High school mathematics and science course completion. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/sod
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Catalyzing change in high school mathematics: Initiating critical conversations. Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2024). High school mathematics: Reimagined, revitalized, and relevant. Author.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB). (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Sacristan, A. (2021). Digital technologies, cultures and mathematics education. Invited lecture at the Fourteenth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Shanghai, China.
Schoenfeld, A., & Daro, P. (2024). More math, less ‘math war.’ Science, 383, 1297–1299. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk6419
Schultz, J. (2024a). How mathematics education in Ohio impacted the nation: Laying the groundwork for reform. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 97, 30–42.
Schultz, J. (2024b). How mathematics education in Ohio impacted the nation: Incorporating technology to carry out the vision. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 98, 30–40.
Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. D. (1998). The role of graphing calculators in mathematics reform. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458108.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting this agreement, the author hereby grants to The Ohio State University, on behalf of its University Libraries
