Patient Satisfaction Concerning CAM Discussions with Primary Care Providers

Authors

  • Karen To

Abstract

With the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) growing in the United States and few primary care providers (PCPs) inquiring about their patients’ CAM usage, patients may be left feeling unsatisfied with their health care. The purpose of this study was to determine the satisfaction of people regarding CAM discussions with their PCP. This study used a descriptive survey design. Data was collected by a questionnaire that was distributed to a convenience sample of 113 participants at public venues. Participants were 18 years of age or older and were able to read and write in English. The sample ranged in age from 20 to 90 years with most being Caucasian (81%) and female (67%). Results showed that 41 participants (36%) used CAM. Twenty-four participants (21%) were asked about their use of CAM by their PCP and 27 participants (24%) stated that they were satisfied with their discussions of CAM with their PCPs. These findings indicated that there were few providers discussing CAM with their patients, despite how many people would like to talk about CAM. Providers may want to become more knowledgeable about CAM therapies so that they can discuss these options and become more sensitive to the needs of their patients.

Author Biography

Karen To

Karen To graduated from the College of Nursing at The Ohio State University in Spring 2009. Currently, she is working on the 8th floor of the James Cancer Hospital as an RN. Although she is not involved in any current projects, she is interested in cancer research and studies involving complementary and alternative medicine. Her research advisor during her undergraduate career was Linda Bernhard, RN, PhD, and Associate Professor at the College of Nursing. She plans on going on to graduate school to further her nursing education.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 (2010)

Section

Oculus Sciences

License

Ethical Considerations

All submitted research must adhere to ethical guidelines. Any research involving the use of human subjects must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and any research involving animal subjects must be approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), as stated in the methods section. If JUROS finds that the research violates ethical guidelines, they may refuse the paper solely on this basis without consideration of other factors.

General Copyright Restrictions